[ Green Books ] [ Horizontal Rule ]
 Search:
[ Horizontal Rule ]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[ Green Books ]
[ Green Books - Exploring the Words and Worlds of J.R.R. Tolkien ] [ Green Books ]
<- PREVIOUS HOME NEXT ->

TURGON'S BOOKSHELF:
Critical Errancies

The New York Times Book Review, that bastion of East Coast US literary snobbery, has deigned to make a rare notice of Tolkien, with a back page column "Hobbits in Hollywood," by one Judith Shulevitz, in the April 22, 2001 issue.

The article is not quite as bad as one might expect, for between the sneers there are occasional acknowledgments that Tolkien did something good. But on the whole, the piece is a conglomeration of irrelevancies, mixed with selective half-truths, and it is clearly the result of a disordered mind.

Shulevitz apparently liked The Hobbit as a child, for she states, "It is heady to know that a book you loved as a child conforms to such meticulous standards of mythical realism." But one wonders if she made it through The Lord of the Rings, for she complains that "by the time you get to The Fellowship of the Ring, the first volume of The Lord of the Rings, Tolkien’s tone has grown somber, even leaden." And she goes further to claim that "The Lord of the Rings was written for adults, but unless you’re a child it’s difficult to accept its mounting portentousness without protest, as the price of entry into the longed-for past."

The longed-for past? If that is why Shulevitz thinks people read Tolkien, she’s dead wrong. Her other conclusions are equally silly. "One of the best things about growing up is realizing that grandeur doesn’t have to be grandiose, nor does historical dialogue have to bristle with fusty archaisms." Why can’t grandeur be occasionally grandiose, even for adults? And her argument about "fusty archaisms" when applied to Tolkien shows a distinct insensitivity to language. Tolkien’s high-style is, on one level, a distancing technique, a way of contrasting his various peoples and cultures, with the hobbits, who, in a complementary low-style, are there to mediate the emotive responses of people as strident as Shulevitz.

Her closing paragraph is almost beyond ridicule for its senselessness. "Tolkien dominates fantasy today because he gave his imaginings the aura of inevitability." Inevitability? No, rather depth, or verisimilitude, but not inevitability. "As a storyteller, he was betrayed by the very pedantry that made his creations memorable." How? What does this sentence mean? That his art was betrayed by his inspiration? I think not.

"He wandered over to the dark side, like an Elf-Lord gone bad." Ignoring the metaphor from Star Wars, again, this means nothing. It is merely a snide opinion framed in jargon.

And finally, Tolkien "formulated a high-minded belief in the importance of his mission as a literary preservationist, which turns out to be death to literature itself." Which is patent nonsense. Shulevitz makes it sound like Tolkien, whom she patronizingly qualifies as "a conservative Roman Catholic" and "the tweediest and most persnickety of Oxford philologists," set out on a mission to preserve the fourteenth century status quo, at least as regards literature. Never mind that Tolkien was clearly an author of the twentieth century (as T.A. Shippey’s new book demonstrates very well), obsessed with a number of the same concerns as his contemporaries.

No, Tolkien had no such mission. He wrote what he liked–what he wanted to write. An enormous number of readers have found pleasure and enrichment in his works. Shulevitz, and others of her ilk, want to draw lines around literature, saying what’s inside this box (that we like) is literature, and it is good, but what’s outside this box (Tolkien included), is not. It’s a very small-minded approach, and one that, given enough time, will fade away. Meanwhile, from their diminishing pulpits, these nay-sayers will continue to whine. Their arguments are tired, and their shrill cries are beginning, happily, to have an unforeseen effect, focusing the public’s attention not on their pronouncements, but on their own inadequacies as critics.

--Turgon



<- PREVIOUS HOME NEXT ->
[ Email this Page to a Friend ] Email this page to a friend!

Email Turgon
turgon@theonering.net

Featured Reading
The Tolkien Fan's Medieval Reader
click to purchase

By Turgon of Theonering.net
[Buy It]


Current Article(s)
09/05
 • Checking in with Anne Petty
 • Checking in with Verlyn Flieger

Past Bookshelf
Listing by Date
"The Prince of All Dragons": A Tolkien Fan's Medieval Reader Extra
01/20/05
Q&A with Henry Gee
11/18/04
Q&A with Anne C. Petty
06/13/04
The Tolkien Fan's Medieval Reader Extras: Selections from The Poetic Edda
06/04/04
More Brief Takes on Recent Books
06/04/04
What is The Tolkien Fan's Medieval Reader?
03/25/04
The Cream of the Crop--Recent Tolkienian Books
02/24/04
Tolkien in Good Company
09/15/03
Q&A with Douglas A. Anderson
09/15/03
An Updated Look at Fall 2003 Tolkien Publications
08/15/03
Q&A with Jane Chance
07/15/03
TTT: The Film Books
06/15/03
Recent and Forthcoming Tolkien-Related Publications 2003
05/27/03
Brief Take on Recent Books
02/01/03
Reading Tolkien beyond The Lord of the Rings
02/01/03
Bilbo’s Last Song
10/01/02
Ted Nasmith’s Two Towers Calendars
10/01/02
A Roundup of Recent and Forthcoming Books by and about J. R. R. Tolkien: Spring and Fall 2002
08/01/02
Revisiting The Marvellous Land of Snergs
05/01/02
Report Card on Film One
12/01/01
Fears II: The Sequel
11/01/01
'Just When You Thought It Was Safe . . .':
What I Fear Most about Peter Jackson's Films

10/01/01
Ted Nasmith’s 2002 Tolkien Calendar
09/01/01
New Tolkien Publications Roundup–Fall 2001
08/01/01
How to Express Your Tolkien Ignorance: A Guide for the Media
07/01/01
An Interview with Tom Shippey
06/01/01
Responses to Critical Errancies
05/01/01
Critical Errancies
04/21/01
New Tolkien Publications, Spring 2001 and Beyond
04/01/01
New Technology Comes to Tolkien
02/01/01
Tolkien as Artist and Illustrator
11/01/00
The 2001 Tolkien Calendar
10/02/00
Tolkienian Publications: Fall 2000 and Beyond
10/01/00
How Not to Study Tolkien
08/23/00
There and Back Again, with Gorbo the Snerg
07/01/00
Tolkien: Life and Letters
06/01/00
Literary Sacrilege
05/01/00
Publications 2000
03/01/00
Millennium Edition
01/11/00
The Best New Tolkien for Christmas
12/19/99
50th Anniversary of Farmer Giles
12/07/99
The Tolkien 2000 Calendar
11/15/99
Hobbitiana
10/24/99
Books - Fall 99
10/24/99
Roverandom
08/22/99
Bookshelf Home

RETURN TO GREEN BOOKS

Related Links
Special links referenced in this article.
• "Hobbits in Hollywood," - Judith Shulevitz, 04/22/01 NYTimes

home | contact us | back to top | site map |search | join list | review this site

This site is maintained and updated by fans of The Lord of the Rings. We in no way claim the artwork displayed to be our own. Copyrights and trademarks for the books, films, and related properties mentioned herein are held by their respective owners and are used solely for promotional purposes of said properties. Design and original photography however are copyright © 2000 TheOneRing.net ™.